This is not hard. When more people do well, more people do well. A briefing from Futurist Chet W. Sisk
The global trends in economic inequality isn't really that hard to figure out. If you create systems where more and more resources are concentrated in the hands of fewer and fewer people, you develop an imbalance of how a system works. Jobs become cheaper and pay less, more poor people are created, and the national economy becomes increasingly more fragile. From 1945 through the early 1970s, there was a period of time in the history of the United States often called "The Great Compression". This time of unprecedented growth and economic prosperity was unmatched in human history. Communities of color didn't see the same benefits of this time due to widespread systemic racism, but in general, the economy grew and grew rapidly. It was called The Great Compression because you didn't have the gigantic gulfs of difference between the very rich and the very poor that you have today. The mechanisms put in place by President Franklin Delano Roosevelt were created to make sure more resources got in the hands of more people so that they could do more things. True to form, it worked, for many Americans. But a funny thing happened on the way to prosperity. After Ronald Reagan was elected, president, things started to trend in a different direction, due to a new set of policies that emphasized "some get....most don't." Once economic inequality started to expand and resources for everyday citizens were seen as "entitlements", the ranks of the very poor swelled, the working poor increased exponentially and the very rich started to own more and more of the world. This isn't a political position. These are the facts as they stand today.
More data in from a Universal Basic Income experiment in Kenya for the last few years backs the basic truth that when more people do well, more people do well. This ground breaking study shows that when you gave people $1000 every month to families for a year, no questions asked, the entire community benefits and prospers....
Despite the growing number of studies that say getting more resources in the hands of more people works for the overall good, there are those who are providing false narratives about job growth, so there is no need to change things.....
So, the evidence says, put more resources in the hands of more people (all of it's people) and you have a robust and thriving economy. Seems simple enough, but there are people against that idea. That being said, here are 3 ways we can introduce empowered communities that duplicate the ideas of strong economies...
Communities must band together. Communities are stronger than individuals and more agile than political groups.
We must embrace a different philosophical view. It's true that when people don't see a hope in the future beyond theor current circumstances, despair and a general collapse of social norms follows.
We must push for Universal Basic Income-like programs. I use that term "universal basic income" loosely. Anything that puts more resources in the hands of more people creates a better economy.
Taking action to empower communities and people is a safe, easy way to avoid an eventual crisis that comes when an economy is grossly imbalanced. It is an unhealthy thing when people feel they have no chance of being able to create a prosperous life of dignity. A four year decline in life expectancy, an anxiety and depression epidemic and runaway drug overdoses are all signs that people are at a crisis state in their existence and cannot see themselves in the future.
Its more true now than it's ever been: when more people do well, more people do well
Chet W. Sisk is an author and one of the world's leading Social Futurists. He is also expert on the current world paradigm shift. Find out more about him and the LEAD Global Team at www.leadtheshift.com or you can write him directly at firstname.lastname@example.org